The Lessons of Jesus

Unit Four · What Got Built With It · Lesson 31

What Was Done to My People

I was a Jew. What did the religion named after me do to my family?

About 8 minutes13 deeper sections

Words to Know

Blood libel — the false accusation that Jews murdered Christian children for ritual purposes.

Expulsion — the forced removal of a whole population from a country.

Synagogue — a Jewish house of prayer and study. I taught in synagogues.

Ghetto — a walled quarter that Jews were required to live in, locked at night.

Say the first thing plainly.

I was born a Jew, lived as a Jew, prayed as a Jew, argued the way Jews argued with each other, and died a Jew.

My mother was a Jew. My brother was a Jew. Every single one of my friends was a Jew.

I never converted to anything, because there was no such thing yet as Christianity. That religion did not exist while I was alive. It was built after I was gone, by others, in my name.

It starts earlier than you think.

Around the year 165, a bishop named Melito of Sardis preached an Easter sermon that survives. In the middle of it he says: God has been murdered. The King of Israel has been put to death by an Israelite right hand. That is the first surviving text that charges the Jews with killing God, and it was preached at Easter, which is the detail you must keep.

Two centuries later Augustine provided the doctrine that governed the next thousand years. The Jews must not be killed. They were to be preserved, scattered and visibly wretched, as living witnesses. It is a protection and a sentence: they must survive, and they must be seen to be losing. 1

Go deeperChrysostom, and Augustine's psalm

Melito preached that sermon in a town in what is now Turkey, and the text was only found in the last century; you can read it today. It came a hundred and thirty years after my execution.

Between Melito and Augustine stood another preacher, in Antioch: John Chrysostom, whose name means golden-mouthed and who is a saint in every branch of the church. In 386 and 387 he preached eight sermons against the Jews, because Christians in his city liked going to the synagogue and he wanted it stopped. They are the most violent language about Jews in the whole of Christian antiquity, and they were read and copied for centuries.

Augustine grounded his doctrine in a psalm, slay them not, and gave the preservation two purposes: the Jews stood as witnesses that the scriptures Christians used were not forged, and as a demonstration of what happens to those who reject me. That doctrine ran the policy of the church for eight hundred years.

Here is what followed, in order.

  • 1096: Crusaders kill the Jewish communities of the Rhine. The reason they give is that these are the people they owe money to.
  • 1144: At Norwich, in England, the blood libel is invented. 2
  • 1215: A church council requires Jews to be marked out by their dress.
  • 1290 to 1492: England, France and Spain expel their Jews and keep what was owed to the Jews.
  • 1348 and 1349: Hundreds of Jewish communities are destroyed in the plague years.
  • 1516 and 1555: Venice and then Rome lock their Jews in ghettos.
Go deeperSpeyer, Worms, Mainz and Cologne

Those communities had names: Speyer, Worms, Mainz and Cologne, destroyed in the spring of 1096 before the crusading bands had reached a single Muslim. You met the massacre already, in Lesson 24, as part of the crusade's story; it belongs here too, because of the reason the killers themselves gave.

The blood libel paid.

In 1144 a boy named William was found dead in a wood near Norwich, and local Jews were accused of killing him for ritual purposes. There was no evidence. Look at who benefited. A knight named Simon de Novers owed money to a Jewish lender and had him killed; the defense mounted for him was that the Jews had murdered the boy. And a monk, Thomas of Monmouth, wrote a book about the boy’s miracles and spent his life promoting a shrine that drew pilgrims and their offerings.

A dead child, an accusation, a book, a shrine, and a revenue stream. It was repeated for eight hundred years, across Europe, into the twentieth century. 3

Go deeperLincoln 1255 and Thomas of Monmouth's shrine

Thomas of Monmouth was a monk of the cathedral priory who arrived some years after William's death and spent the rest of his life promoting the cult anyway. The body was eventually moved into the cathedral itself, and the offerings followed it there.

The same pattern repeated in Lincoln in 1255, with the same kind of beneficiary. A boy named Hugh was found dead in a well, and nineteen Jews were taken to London and hanged. The king had recently sold his rights over the Jews of England to his brother, so convicting them of a capital crime sent their property straight to the crown. A shrine to Little Saint Hugh went up in Lincoln Cathedral and drew pilgrims for centuries, and the story was still being retold as literature two hundred years later.

In 1955, Lincoln Cathedral put up a plaque beside the site calling the story trumped up, noting that it cost many innocent Jews their lives, and asking pardon for it. Seven hundred years passed between the killing and that apology.4

The moneylending was a trap, and it was built.

The church forbade Christians to lend at interest, and its law did not bind Jews. The guilds and the land laws shut Jews out of nearly every other trade. Then the king treated them as his property and taxed them at will, so they had to call in their loans, and the borrowers hated the man at the door. They did not hate the king. They hated the man at the door. 5

Go deeperThe York massacre of 1190

The system did not stay abstract. In 1190 the Jews of York were besieged in the castle tower; many killed themselves, and the rest were killed on surrendering. The debtors then went to the cathedral and burned the bond records that proved what they owed.

The crown's answer was not protection. It required every debt to a Jew to be registered in duplicate and kept in a locked chest in each town, so that records could not be destroyed again and the crown's share could always be collected.

The other two walls of the trap had their own texture. Church councils across the twelfth century did not merely forbid Christian lending; one of them ruled that a manifest usurer was to be excommunicated and denied Christian burial. And the guilds that shut Jews out were themselves religious fraternities, built on Christian oaths and patron saints, and holding land normally required oaths and military service that were closed to them as well.

Then the kings expelled them and collected the debts.

In 1290 Edward I expelled every Jew from England, and the debts owed to them became debts owed to the king. In 1306 Philip IV did the same in France, and the next year seized the Knights Templar, his other great creditors. In 1492 Ferdinand and Isabella gave the Jews of Spain four months to convert or leave, without their gold or silver. How many left is disputed, somewhere between forty thousand and well over a hundred thousand. Whatever you think that was about, it was not about theology. 6

Go deeper1278, the Templars, and Inter Caetera

England's expulsion did not come out of nowhere. Fifteen years earlier Edward I had already banned Jewish moneylending outright, cutting off their ability to pay the taxes he kept levying, and in 1278 he had hundreds arrested on a charge of clipping coin and a great many hanged. When the expulsion came in July 1290, it removed two or three thousand people, and in that same parliament Edward was granted a tax historians describe as the largest of his reign. No Jew lived in England legally for the next three hundred and sixty-six years.

Philip IV's move in France was just as calculated. He arrested every Jew in the country on a single day in July 1306 and confiscated everything before expelling them. When he turned on the Templars the following year, the charge was heresy. There were further returns and further expulsions after 1306, ending with a final one in 1394.

Spain's edict was signed in March 1492. The last ships carrying Jews out sailed that same summer, and Columbus sailed in August. The document that handed the new world to Spain, Inter Caetera, came the following spring from a Spanish pope to those same two monarchs. In the same eighteen months, one crown emptied its country of one people and gained title to lands full of others.

In the plague years, the money did the killing.

When the plague came in 1348, the rumour was that Jews had poisoned the wells. In Strasbourg, on 14 February 1349, several hundred Jews were burned in their own cemetery, before the plague had reached the city at all. A Christian chronicler of that city wrote the reason down: if they had been poor, and if the lords of the land had not been in debt to them, they would not have been burned.

And, to be fair, the pope, Clement VI, issued two bulls forbidding the killing. He was ignored, everywhere. 7

Go deeperDeath tolls, Strasbourg's council, and Clement's bulls

Between a third and a half of Europe died in that plague, and nobody knew why. Confessions that Jews had poisoned the wells were obtained by torture, exactly as you saw in Lesson 28, then circulated between towns as evidence.

Over those two years hundreds of Jewish communities across Germany, Switzerland, France and Spain were destroyed, burned, drowned, or killed in their own houses; more Jews died in that span than in any comparable period before the Nazis.

At Strasbourg the burning happened on a platform built for the purpose in the Jews' own cemetery, after the town council refused to act against them and was overthrown by the guilds, who then carried it out.

Clement VI, the treasury-of-merit pope from Lesson 25, issued his two bulls in 1348, arguing that Jews were dying of the plague in the same numbers as everyone else, which they were, and that the charge against them was therefore absurd. That the ban went unheeded everywhere says something about how much of this was ever really taking orders from Rome.

The church marked them and walled them in.

In 1215 a church council required Jews to be distinguishable by their dress, and in practice that meant a badge or a hat. When a government in the 1930s required a yellow star, it was not inventing anything. In Rome, in 1555, Pope Paul IV confined the city’s Jews to a walled ghetto, and that ghetto was not abolished until 1870. 8

And the riots came at Easter, on the anniversary of my death, year after year, after a liturgy that told the story with the guilt assigned. The rioters thought they were doing it for me.

Go deeperTalmud trial, Venice's ghetto, and passion plays

That requirement has a number: canon 68 of the same 1215 council that made confession compulsory. In practice it took the shape of a badge or a distinctive hat, different from country to country, worn in places until the eighteenth century.

The church did not stop at clothing. In 1240 the Talmud itself was put on trial in Paris, an actual trial with the books as defendant, and in 1242 something like twenty-four cartloads of Jewish manuscripts, most of them irreplaceable, were burned in a public square. Jews were also compelled by law to attend Christian sermons preached at them, in some cities weekly, with officials posted to make sure they were listening.

The word ghetto itself comes from this history. In Venice, in March 1516, the city required its Jews to live on the site of an old foundry, the geto in Venetian, with the gates locked each night by guards whose wages the Jewish community was required to pay.

Paul IV's 1555 bull went further than a wall: it also ordered the distinctive hat, restricted Jews to dealing in second-hand cloth and pawnbroking, and allowed them only one synagogue. That ghetto lasted three hundred and fifteen years, in the city where this book's institution has its head office.

By the later Middle Ages, passion plays staged the Easter story in the open air, in the local language, for crowds who could not read, with Jewish characters costumed to be recognizable. That performance, repeated every year, fed the riots directly.

Now I have to answer the two sentences in my own book that were used for all of it.

The first is Matthew 27:25, where the crowd at my trial shouts: his blood be on us and on our children. It appears in one gospel and nowhere else. It is a line shouted by a crowd in one courtyard on one morning, written by a Jew about other Jews in the middle of a family fight. Turning it into a hereditary sentence on every Jewish child born for sixty generations is not an interpretation. It is a pretext. Luke has me saying, from the cross, Father, forgive them (Luke 23:34). That line is missing from some of the oldest manuscripts, but it is in your Bible, and so is Matthew 27:25, and Christendom chose which of the two to build on.

The second is John 8:44, where I am recorded saying to my opponents: you are of your father the devil. It is harsher. But every single person in that room is a Jew, including me, in an argument about who is really faithful. Fierce speech inside a family is not the same act as the same words said about that family from outside it. Whatever I said in the Temple that day, I did not say it about my mother’s people, and it was not a warrant.

In 1965, a Roman council declared that my execution cannot be charged against all the Jews then living, nor against the Jews of today. 9

Go deeperIsaiah, Jeremiah, and John's late gospel

Some details sharpen both verses further. The Matthew 27:25 crowd was perhaps a few dozen people, in a city of tens of thousands, in a country of a million, of a people spread across the world. Mark does not have that line, Luke does not have it, John does not have it; it survives only in Matthew, the most Jewish of the four gospels, written by a Jew for Jewish readers arguing an inner-Jewish case. That is part of why turning it into a pretext works only if nobody checks: nobody has ever applied the same rule of inherited guilt to any other sentence in the book. My words from the cross that same morning, in full, were: Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.

On John 8:44, look at the company the line keeps. Open the prophets and you will find worse said by Jews to Jews: Isaiah calls his own nation Sodom, Jeremiah says the whole city is corrupt. John's gospel was also written last, decades later, at a time when my followers and the synagogue were separating bitterly and being thrown out of one another's buildings; that gospel's habit of saying "the Jews" when it means the Jerusalem authorities belongs to that moment, not to the scene itself.

The 1965 declaration went further than the single sentence about my execution: it also stated that the Jews are not rejected or accursed.

In 1543, Martin Luther published a book aimed straight at my own people.

You must have the whole arc. In 1523, the same Luther published a warm pamphlet, That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew, saying Christians had treated Jews abominably. He expected that once the gospel was preached properly, they would convert. The kindness was a method.

They did not convert. In 1543 he published On the Jews and Their Lies. It recommends, in a numbered list, that Christians burn the synagogues, raze Jewish houses, take away their prayer books, forbid their rabbis to teach on pain of death, and confiscate their money. Then, he says, drive them out of the country.

That is the arc: a man whose goodwill was conditional on conversion, turning savage when the condition was not met. Kindness that is a recruitment strategy has a bill attached, and it comes due.

That book was reprinted in Germany in the 1930s. At Nuremberg, the Nazi publisher Julius Streicher said in his own defense that Martin Luther would very likely be sitting in the dock in his place. In 1994 the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America formally repudiated those writings. 10 11

Go deeperThe 1523 pamphlet and the full 1543 list

Luther's 1523 pamphlet did not mince words in either direction: he wrote that Christians had treated Jews more like pigs than like human beings, and that if he had been a Jew and seen how the faith was taught and governed, he would sooner have become a pig than a Christian. He expected conversion once the gospel was preached properly, his way, cleaned of Rome.

His 1543 list went further than burning synagogues and confiscating money. It also called for covering the remains with earth, putting Jews under one roof like gypsies, seizing their Talmudic writings along with their prayer books, abolishing their right of safe travel on the roads, and putting a flail or an axe in the hands of the young and strong to make them earn their bread by sweat.

That book was displayed at party rallies as well as reprinted, and it circulated through the 1930s and into the 1940s. Streicher, who published the most vicious antisemitic newspaper in Germany, made his Nuremberg comparison only as a defense, under oath, as a man trying to save his own neck. He was hanged anyway.

The 1994 Lutheran declaration went beyond repudiation: it also expressed deep and abiding sorrow and rejected the use that had been made of Luther's writings.

In 1933, the German churches applied the same doctrine to their own pastors.

That year a movement called the German Christians took control of most of the regional Protestant churches, and the largest of them adopted the Aryan Paragraph: no one of Jewish descent could serve as a pastor. It is a church deciding that baptism does not count if your grandmother was Jewish. A minority refused and formed the Confessing Church, and in 1934 issued the Barmen Declaration. But Barmen says nothing about the Jews. It defended the church’s independence, not the people being persecuted outside the church door. 12

Go deeperSpouses barred, and what Barmen really said

The Aryan Paragraph reached further than the lesson above suggests: it barred not only pastors of Jewish descent but anyone married to a person of Jewish descent from holding any church office at all.

Before it was known as the Confessing Church, the pastors who refused had formed an emergency league. Their Barmen Declaration, issued in May 1934, rejected the claim that the church could take its message from anything but the word of God, which is what Barmen actually defended: not the persecuted, but the church's own right to speak on its own authority. Most of the Confessing Church's energy went toward protecting baptized Christians of Jewish descent, its own members, rather than Jews as such.

In 1939, a church institute set out to erase my Jewishness from my own faith.

At Eisenach, where Luther had translated the New Testament, an institute was founded with a name that states its purpose: the Institute for the Study and Eradication of Jewish Influence on German Church Life. Its director was a New Testament professor, Walter Grundmann, and nearly a dozen regional Protestant churches supported it. In 1940 it published a de-Judaized New Testament, with me recast as an opponent of Judaism. It took hallelujah and amen out of the hymnbook and discarded the Old Testament entirely. 13 14

They were editing me. They were removing my nation from my own words, so that their nation could keep me.

Go deeperThe Wartburg, and The Message of God

The institute was founded on a specific day, 6 May 1939, at the Wartburg, the castle above Eisenach. It held conferences and employed scholars with doctorates.

Its de-Judaized New Testament, published in 1940, carried its own title: The Message of God. A year later, in 1941, they produced a hymnbook that had taken out the Hebrew words hallelujah, hosanna and amen.

This is the end of the road that starts with a title on a flag, back in Unit One, Lesson 2. If I am only a title, my people are removable. If I am a man from a village, they are not.

One pastor read it right.

In April 1933, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote that the church must bind up the victims of the state whoever they are, church members or not, and if necessary jam a spoke in the wheel itself. He helped Jews escape to Switzerland and joined the conspiracy against the Nazi regime. He had been safe in America in 1939, and sailed home. He was hanged on 9 April 1945, at thirty-nine. 15

That same essay also repeats the old theology, that Jewish suffering is bound up with their rejection of me. He moved, and by the end he was risking his life for people he had no intention of converting. The useful fact about Bonhoeffer is not that he was pure. It is that a man carrying the ordinary prejudice of his church nonetheless saw what was happening, and moved, and paid for it. 16

Go deeperFourteen people, and why he went home

Bonhoeffer's essay actually framed three possible church responses to a state acting wrongly, and the line already quoted above was only the third: first, to ask whether the state's action was even legitimate; second, to bind up the victims regardless of who they were; and third, the spoke in the wheel. That third option was never about bandaging the victims of the machine. It was about stopping the machine.

He acted on it. In 1942 he took part in an operation that got fourteen people out to Switzerland under cover of military intelligence. He was arrested in April 1943 and held for two years before he was hanged, a month before the war in Europe ended.

His stay in America in 1939 had come by way of a lecture invitation. He lasted about two weeks there before sailing home, because he judged he had no right to help rebuild his country afterward if he had not shared its worst hour.

The old theology in that same 1933 essay went further than rejection: Bonhoeffer treated the conversion of Jews as the church's proper hope for them. He wrote the bravest sentence any German churchman wrote that year in a paragraph that still carried the disease. His later writing moved past it, but neither he nor the movement he belonged to started clean.

Here is why this lesson is in the book.

It is not here to make you feel guilty. You did none of it.

It is here because many Christians came to hold that my people were replaced, or superseded, or finished with, and that the older part of the Bible is a warm-up act for the part about me. That idea is what made everything above thinkable.

And it is not true, and I never said it. I said I had not come to abolish the law (Matthew 5:17). I said the greatest commandment was the one every Jewish child already recited twice a day (Mark 12:29–30).

Everything I taught, I taught out of that book, to those people, in their own argument.

You cannot keep me and discard them. It has been tried, in an office at Eisenach, and it produced something monstrous.

Check It Yourself

Look up: Matthew 5:17, then Mark 12:29–30. You will find that I said I had not come to abolish the law, and that the greatest commandment I named is a quotation from the Jewish prayer said daily.

Then look up the two verses used against my people: Matthew 27:25 and John 8:44. Read the whole scene around each. Count how many gospels contain the first one. Notice, in the second, that every person in the room is a Jew.

Then read: Martin Luther, That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew (1523) and On the Jews and Their Lies (1543), in that order, twenty years apart. Both are in Luther’s Works in English.

The Short Version

  • I was a Jew, and so was everyone I knew.
  • The charge that the Jews killed God began in an Easter sermon about 165, and the blood libel began at Norwich in 1144, where a debtor and a shrine profited.
  • The moneylending trap was built, and the expulsions of 1290, 1306 and 1492 handed the debts to the crown.
  • Luther turned from kindness in 1523 to On the Jews and Their Lies in 1543, and the Eisenach institute (1939) edited the Jewishness out of me.
  • Bonhoeffer said the church must jam the spokes of the wheel, and was hanged in April 1945.

Think About It

  1. If you take the Jewish part out of me, what is left?
  2. Luther was kind in 1523 because he expected the Jews to convert. Is any of the kindness in your own church conditional in that way? How would you find out?
Go deeperUsury, Nostra Aetate, and Romans 11

Three more words matter here. Usury is lending money at interest; for most of this period the church forbade Christians to do it. Supersessionism is the idea that Christians have replaced the Jews as God's people. Deicide is the killing of God, the charge made against a whole people.

Paul himself is worth a look: Romans 11:1 and 11:29 say, in his own letter, that God has not rejected his people.

Canon 68, which you read in this lesson, sits in the same 1215 council whose canon 21 you already read back in Lesson 24. Melito's sermon has a title, On Pascha, and it is in print in English if you want the whole thing. The 1965 Catholic declaration also has a name and an address: Nostra Aetate, section 4, issued 28 October 1965. It is one page long. The Lutheran church's 1994 statement is formally titled its Declaration to the Jewish Community.

One more question: Bonhoeffer was safe abroad in 1939 and chose to go home anyway. What made that the more faithful choice?

Sources for this lesson

Every numbered note in the text points here, so nothing has to be taken on trust.

  1. Melito of Sardis, Peri Pascha (On Pascha), usually dated about 160-180, recovered in the twentieth century from papyri: 'God has been murdered; the King of Israel has been put to death by an Israelite right hand.' It is the earliest surviving text making the deicide charge, and it is a paschal homily. John Chrysostom preached eight Adversus Judaeos homilies at Antioch in 386-87, directed at Christians attending synagogue. Augustine's 'witness' doctrine appears at City of God 18.46 and in the Tractatus adversus Judaeos, applying Psalm 59:11 ('slay them not'): the Jews are to be preserved in a subordinate condition as involuntary witnesses to the scriptures. On the whole development see Jeremy Cohen, Living Letters of the Law, and Paula Fredriksen, Augustine and the Jews. ↩
  2. The blood libel first appears at Norwich in 1144 and recurs across Europe for centuries. ↩
  3. Thomas of Monmouth, a monk of Norwich cathedral priory who arrived some years after William’s death, wrote The Life and Passion of William of Norwich from about 1150, promoting the cult; the body was translated several times, finally into the cathedral, and attracted offerings. The one legal proceeding arising from the affair concerned the knight Simon de Novers, who was indebted to the Jewish financier Eleazar (Deulesalt) and was accused of Eleazar’s murder; the ritual-murder charge was raised in his defence. English translation by Miri Rubin (Penguin, 2014); see also E. M. Rose, The Murder of William of Norwich (2015). ↩
  4. Hugh of Lincoln died in 1255; some ninety Jews were arrested and nineteen were hanged in London after Copin's confession under duress. Henry III had transferred his rights over the Jewry to his brother Richard of Cornwall shortly before, so that forfeitures from a capital conviction accrued differently; the episode is discussed in all standard accounts of the English Jewry. A shrine in Lincoln Cathedral attracted pilgrims; Chaucer's Prioress's Tale alludes to the story. A plaque placed by the cathedral in 1955 describes such stories as 'trumped up' and asks pardon. ↩
  5. The Second Lateran Council (1139) and Third Lateran Council (1179, canon 25) condemned manifest usurers, the latter excluding them from communion and Christian burial; canon law did not bind Jews. Guild membership required Christian oaths and observances; landholding was restricted by tenurial oaths and, in many jurisdictions, by explicit prohibition. In England the Jews were held to be the king's chattels and taxed by tallage at the crown's discretion; the Exchequer of the Jews administered this. After the York massacre of March 1190, in which the Jews besieged in Clifford's Tower died and the surviving records of debt were burned in the cathedral, the Ordinance of the Jewry of 1194 required all debts to be registered in duplicate chirographs kept in archae, chests in designated towns, so that the crown's interest could not be destroyed. ↩
  6. England: the Statute of the Jewry (1275) prohibited Jewish moneylending; the coin-clipping arrests of 1278-79 led to numerous executions; the Edict of Expulsion was issued on 18 July 1290, affecting perhaps 2,000-3,000 people, with property forfeited to the crown and outstanding debts taken over by it. Parliament granted Edward I a substantial lay subsidy in the same year. Jews were not readmitted to England until the 1650s. France: Philip IV ordered the arrest of all Jews on 22 July 1306, confiscated their property, transferred the debts owed to them to the crown, and expelled them; he arrested the Templars, his other principal creditors, on 13 October 1307. Readmissions and further expulsions followed, the final one in 1394. Spain: the Alhambra Decree of 31 March 1492 gave Jews until the end of July to convert or leave, forbidding the export of gold and silver. Estimates of the number who left range widely, from around 40,000 to well over 100,000; older figures of 200,000 or more are now generally rejected. ↩
  7. The persecutions of 1348-49 destroyed several hundred Jewish communities across the Empire, Switzerland, France and Aragon. At Strasbourg on 14 February 1349 several hundred Jews (contemporary estimates range from about 900 to 2,000) were burned in the Jewish cemetery, before the plague had reached the city; the council that had resisted was deposed by the guilds days earlier. Jacob von Konigshofen's Strasbourg chronicle states that the money was the reason, and that if the Jews had been poor and the lords had not been in debt to them they would not have been burned. Clement VI issued bulls on 6 July and 26 September 1348 (Quamvis perfidiam) forbidding the killings and noting that Jews were dying of the plague equally. ↩
  8. Fourth Lateran Council 1215, canon 68, required distinctive dress for Jews and Muslims; implementation varied by kingdom, as badge or hat. The Talmud was condemned after the Paris disputation of 1240 and burned in 1242, the chronicles giving twenty to twenty-four cartloads. Compulsory attendance at conversionary sermons was imposed in various jurisdictions, systematically in Rome from the sixteenth century. Venice required its Jews to reside in the Ghetto Nuovo from 29 March 1516, with gates closed at night and the community charged for the guards. Paul IV's bull Cum nimis absurdum, 14 July 1555, established the Roman ghetto, imposed the distinctive hat, limited the Jews to one synagogue and confined them largely to dealing in second-hand goods and pawnbroking. The Roman ghetto was abolished in 1870. ↩
  9. Matthew 27:25 has no parallel in Mark, Luke or John. On the composition and audience of Matthew as an intra-Jewish document see the standard commentaries. John 8:44 occurs within a dispute set in the Temple between Jesus and Jewish interlocutors; the Fourth Gospel's use of hoi Ioudaioi frequently denotes the Jerusalem authorities, and the gospel is generally dated after the separation of the Johannine community from the synagogue. Luke 23:34a ('Father, forgive them') is absent from several early manuscripts, including P75 and the original hand of Vaticanus, and is bracketed in many modern editions. Nostra Aetate, Second Vatican Council, 28 October 1965, section 4, states that what was done in the passion cannot be charged against all Jews then living, nor against the Jews of today, and that the Jews are not rejected or accursed. ↩
  10. Martin Luther, On the Jews and Their Lies, 1543, reprinted and circulated in Germany in the 1930s and 40s. ↩
  11. Luther, That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew (1523), argues for humane treatment and free trade with Jews, in the expectation of their conversion, and contains the remark that had he been a Jew he would sooner have become a pig than a Christian given how the faith was taught. On the Jews and Their Lies (1543) sets out seven numbered recommendations: burn the synagogues and schools; raze their houses; confiscate prayer books and Talmudic writings; forbid rabbis to teach on pain of death; abolish safe-conduct on the highways; prohibit usury and confiscate cash and valuables; and put flail, axe and spade into the hands of the young and strong. Both are in Luther's Works, volumes 45 and 47. Julius Streicher stated at Nuremberg on 29 April 1946 that Luther would likely be in the dock in his place had the book been put in evidence. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America adopted its Declaration to the Jewish Community on 18 April 1994, repudiating these writings. ↩
  12. The German Christian movement won about two thirds of the seats in the church elections of 23 July 1933. The general synod of the Evangelical Church of the Old Prussian Union, meeting on 5-6 September 1933 (the 'Brown Synod'), adopted the Aryan Paragraph excluding clergy and officials of Jewish descent, or married to persons of Jewish descent. The Pastors' Emergency League was formed in response and grew to some 6,000-7,000 members; the Confessing Church's Barmen Declaration of 29-31 May 1934 rejected the subordination of the church's message to other authorities but made no statement about the persecution of Jews, and the Confessing Church's practical advocacy was directed chiefly at baptized Christians of Jewish descent. ↩
  13. The "German Christian" movement, and the Institute for the Study and Eradication of Jewish Influence on German Church Life, founded at Eisenach in 1939. The Institute published a dejudaized New Testament (1940) and hymnal (1941) and discarded the Hebrew scriptures. ↩
  14. The Institute for the Study and Eradication of Jewish Influence on German Church Life was founded at the Wartburg, above Eisenach, on 6 May 1939, with the New Testament scholar Walter Grundmann of Jena as academic director; around eleven regional churches supported it. It published Die Botschaft Gottes (1940), a de-Judaized New Testament, and a hymnal with Hebrew words removed (1941), and rejected the Old Testament. See Susannah Heschel, The Aryan Jesus (2008). ↩
  15. Dietrich Bonhoeffer was hanged at Flossenbürg on 9 April 1945. ↩
  16. Bonhoeffer's essay 'The Church and the Jewish Question' (April 1933) sets out three possible responses of the church to the state - questioning its legitimacy, aiding the victims whether or not they belong to the church, and seizing the wheel itself - and also repeats traditional theological claims about Jewish suffering as a consequence of the rejection of Christ and looks to conversion. He took part in Operation 7 in 1942, which brought fourteen Jews to Switzerland. He was arrested on 5 April 1943 and hanged at Flossenburg on 9 April 1945. ↩